SEO WORLD NEWS

The hottest seo news

Archive for the ‘seoworldnewscom’ Category

3G in The 3rd World - Not so Claro

Friday, December 21st, 2007

Yesterday I bought Claro’s 3G Wireless Data Service in Brazil. I’m not going to tortue you with the excrutiating details of the 5 hour ordeal to order the service that included everything short of a rectal exam. Instead, I’ll focus on the QoS:

So far my top rate in 8.7 kb/s upstream and 91.6 kb/s Downstream. Normally it’s MUCH slower and it disconnects about 3 times per hour. At the store, they pitched “1 Mb/s” Transfer rate and up to 10 Gigs of transfer per month before it slows down. What a load of horse shit. Hands down, Dial-Up in the US outperforms this shitty “3G” service from Claro

SEOmoz’s Unusual SearchTerms from the Month of November

Friday, December 21st, 2007

Posted by rebecca

As a special pre-holiday treat, we decided to share our more long tail search terms from last month (November 2007). Enjoy!

  • How to read minds: 225 searches. Ever wonder how Rand seems to have so many eerily accurate predictions about the future of search engine algorithm changes? Well, so do 225 other people…
  • Titties: 52 searches (thank Lucas for that one)
  • Better than google: 51 searches. Meh, we already knew that SEOmoz was better than Google, sliced bread, and real butter combined (mmmmm, butter and Google sandwich…)
  • How to speak English: 41 searches. Sadly, we only offer a course on "How to Speak English with the Occasional Injections of Superfluous U’s into Words," taught by our favo(u)rite Kiwi, Jane.
  • Barry bonds before and after: 22 searches. Sounds like a Jeopardy category waiting to happen…
  • Good questions to ask: 22 searches. If you have to search for this, then you fail as a human being.
  • Mud wrestling: 19 searches. How did they know about our team building exercises?
  • Simpsonized pictures: 18 searches. I only threw this in because I geekily think it’s cool that we rank for something Simpsons-related.
  • What is an encyclopedia: 13 searches. Seriously? Seriously?!
  • 20 questions to ask a guy: 10 searches. Um, ask them anything. It’s not like Jane Goodall with the apes, for crying out loud.
  • the incredibles: 10 searches. Hooray, we rank for a Pixar film!
  • list of every website: 9 searches. Google returns a page saying "Displaying one of eleventy billion results."

6 searches:

  • ive got a golden ticket. That golden ticket, of course, is *ahemshamelessplug* an SEOmoz Premium Membership! Woo hoo!
  • fastest spider. I’d like to see a sequel search query called "2 fast 2 spider," but that’s just me.
  • hot young things. That’s right. At SEOmoz we’re so damn hot.

4 searches:

  • Good to great Collins: I’d say good Collins is True Colors, but great Collins is Sussudio.
  • Gorgeous website:  Why, thank you! I’d say it’s not too shabby!
  • Self cannibalization: I bet we taste like spam (zing).
  • Most romantic proposal. Yeah yeah, we know, Rand’s romantic mushy mushy all that good stuff.

3 searches:

  • how to freebase coke. Rand, is that how you’re able to stay up so late blogging? We may need to stage an intervention…
  • things to do with your spouse. Oh, I don’t know, how about converse with them instead of spending all your time in front of a computer?
  • set it and forget it rotisserie. My mom has one of these. When she first got it she made pork roast every weekend. I call that period of my life "the best ever."
  • titties, titties, titties. Once again, thanks, Lucas.
  • what to say to your loved one. Well, "I love you" is a start…
  • how is oatmeal made? By grinding up pigeons, of course.

Two searches:

  • internet makes people lazy.  I’d like to see Google return a one box answer of "No sh*t, Sherlock."
  • pay attention to me. Aw, they think the Internet is people!
  • paris Hilton thumbs. They’re probably covered with a mutant strain of gonorrhea.
  • how does google see my site. Through the tiny camera they installed in you the last time you got knocked out at the dentist, silly!
  • I work for google. I bet Adam Lasnik and Matt Cutts searched for this one, with Google returning a one box response of "Sigh, we know."
  • Why Canadians are the best at hockey. Uh, a healthy diet of maple syrup and Tim Horton’s?
  • What are titties. Ok, seriously, Lucas…
  • Weird porn thumbs. Apparently, if you have weird thumbs then you are well-equipped for a lucrative career in porn.
  • How to speak the English. The fact that it’s "the English" makes this search so much better.
  • How big is the world wide web. Oh, I’d say it’s about 650 Courics big.
  • Nambla site password: I bet there’s a fake retrieval site out there that promises the password and then busts the people who try to obtain it. It’s probably run by Chris Hansen ("Why don’t you take a seat…").
  • How to read minds for real. The "for real" part cracked me up, as if Google only shows the real results to people who are serious about mind reading.
  • Michael martinez hardcore seo. I bet the two people who searched for this term were Michael Martinez and his mom.
  • Names to call your loved one. I don’t recommend "ho bag."
  • What if ron paul wins? I wonder how many people were expecting a straight answer from Google (e.g., "Well, then you’re effed, I suppose").
  • Rebecca Kelley arrested. Okay, for the record, that old lady deserved it.
  • Hat sex xxx. Not only do these folks want hat sex, but they want it in its raunchiest form (hence the xxx).
  • Things to do when your wife is away. How about hat sex?
  • Underpants gnomes. Step 3: Profit!
  • Naked john Michaels. John Michaels, I’m not sure who you are, but apparently some folks are looking for nude photos of you. Just a heads up.

One search:

  • Whats the number to the guy who invented the world wide web? It’s 555-are-you-effing-serious.
  • Good questions to ask people in truth or dare. How about "I dare you to get your ass off the computer and go for a walk outside, for crying out loud."
  • Is crack and freebase same thing. Okay, seriously, Rand, I’m going to tell you about this nifty little program. There are 12 "steps" too, and I know how much you like lists…
  • Why cliques are skinny. Because being able to see your sternum is all the rage now!
  • I can’t live without you. Aw, thanks!
  • Complete appetizer setup. Crab cakes and prawns of some sort are a definite must.
  • Evil cattle. They’ll moo-rder you.
  • Do you consider yourself to be lucky / unlucky? Give an example. It’s like this person is signing Google up for a dating site. "Google, describe your perfect date…"
  • Words to make up. If you search for a word to make up and find one, isn’t that word already made up? Just throw some darts at a poster of the alphabet, for crying out loud.
  • How to break a tedious day. This person has the freakin’ INTERNET right at his fingertips, and he performs a search on how to break up a tedious day. Clearly the man does not know what StumbleUpon is.
  • Please stop it.  Aw, but I’m almost done!
  • Art with elephant on stilts. This is so absurdly specific that I kind of want one for myself.
  • How much is matt cutts worth. I bet Matt’s wife searched for this shortly after that life insurance policy kicked in…
  • Letting employees create their own fun. Ten bucks says that Bruce Clay searched for this. "Here, Lisa, here’s a slinky. You get to play with it for five minutes, and then it’s back to work."
  • Hammer pants blog. Oh man, I’d so read this. I bet it’s 2 legit, 2 legit 2 quit (hey heyyyyyyyyyy).
  • How do people start getting famous. Don’t wear underwear. That’s a good start.
  • Things you shouldnt do to your girlfriends dad. I’m guessing that asking him for a condom is at the top of the list…
  • Why must people be very careful when using ether. Geez, I’d hate to see this guy’s search history (I bet we’ll find "why does fire feel ouchy," "how come I can’t breathe underwater," and "gasoline smells good").
  • How is it anatomically possible for someone to have super powers? God, I love the Internet.
  • Ten signs that a man is never going to marry you. #1: You have a Cathy comic on your fridge and instead of a blanket, you sleep with 12 cats to keep you warm.
  • Why does someone keep bugging me. Maybe it’s because you’re on your computer all day, and your roommate needs your rent check, you lazy arse.
  • Opposing views on how anorexia and bulimia are bad for you. I like how this person wants to hear "opposing" view, like "Con: You can die. Pro: You’ll fit into those skinny leg jeans!"
  • How to make him think he cant live without me. The gift of an *ahemshamelessplug* SEOmoz Premium Membership is a good start! It’s the gift that keeps on giving!

Hopefully you enjoyed a peek at our silly search phrases. We want to wish our readers a happy and safe holiday, and best of luck to everyone in the new year!

Do you like this post? Yes No

(NY Times < Blogs) < Wikipedia

Friday, December 21st, 2007

The Long Bet Shows that Blogs Slightly outrank the NYTimes in Google. But the Wikipedia Trounces them both.

In 2002, blogging evangelist Dave Winer made a long bet with New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz: “In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007, weblogs will rank higher than the New York Times’ Web site.”

Today, Associated Press editors and news directors chose the top 10 news stories of the year, which makes it possible to determine who won the bet.

 

Domain Trust is more important than it ever has been before for organic search. Realize that leveraging domain trust of sites you do not own should be a part of your search strategy.

Whiteboard Friday - “Changing Context”

Friday, December 21st, 2007

Posted by great scott!

Hey Gang! This week Rand talks to NetConcepts’ CEO, Stephan Spencer, about cloaking and redirection via black hat, gray hat, and white hat methods.  This is pretty high-level stuff but incredibly interesting, even if it is of questionable Glegality (that’s Google Legality, heyooo!).  Is it effective? It sure as hell can be. Will it get you into trouble? Well, only if you get caught I suppose, which is why Google is rumored to have the "Boser Tool" that they use to try and keep an eye out for this stuff.

Anyway, enjoy the video and happy holidays to all of you wonderful, beautiful folks!  We’ll be back next week with another brand new Whiteboard Friday. 

p.s. For those who may not be aware, Stephan’s blog was hacked this week - sorry about that, buddy :)

Do you like this post? Yes No

Thursday Roundup for the Week of 12/16/07

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Posted by rebecca

It’s Thursday, so you know what that means: another installment of Roundup Thursday! This week, I’m implementing a more formal layout that will be executed in every recap post from here on out. Hope you enjoy it!

That being said…

New Additions to the SEOmoz Marketplace:

Featured job postings:

Featured companies:

Featured resumes:

New Events added to the Events Calendar:

Stories, news, and other notable items from the past week:

  • Eric Enge interviews Sep Kamvar, engineering lead for personalization at Google. It’s a fairly standard interview that covers the definition of personalization and basic factors Google uses, which is why this link gets 3 out of 5 Moz Stars (that’s right, we’re rating the links in our roundups!).
  • FoundRead provides a post about Startup Math, and how 1+1 = 1/2 due to the time and effort it takes to train a new hire. It’s a cheeky observation, which is why I give it 4 stars.
  • PBS has a piece about how journalists and bloggers suck at startups. It posits that the failure rate is due to writers thinking they know more than they actually do, and their excitement at being a part of something rather than just covering it or writing about it. It’s a pretty interesting (and kind of depressing–guess I’m doomed to never succeed at startups) article.
  • Jon Mendez wrote his top 10 multivariate and A/B testing results in 2007. This is a really interesting list, and a lot of factors that you wouldn’t think would make a difference in conversions indeed made a big difference. We may need to test a few of these out for ourselves, as we’re in the process of tweaking our landing pages.
  • Stephan Spencer brings us another solid interview for Roundup Thursday, this time with Matt Cutts. Some of their topics of discussion include social bookmarking links, the "value" myth of .edu links, are poorly constructed site maps really just doorway pages, and more. It’s a good interview, but it’s fairly long.
  • The NY Times, ReadWriteWeb, and this interview with Peter Norvig, Google director of research, all state that Google admits to using actual, living breathing people for feedback on their search results along with user clicks/their algorithm. Danny Sullivan countered with a "Yawn, we already knew this k thanks" response on Search Engine Land.
  • Apollo SEM brings us a comprehensive step-by-step on how to expose Adwords keyword data beyond "other unique queries" in search query reports. After implementing the changes, you should be able to see the exact search query a user typed in that brought him/her to your ad.
  • Portent Interactive had a staff linkbait contest, and the winner created PPC Villain. The "Internet Marketing Domination Seminar" video (link to bigger video on YouTube) is very amusing if you’re in the industry (which I am, so I thought it was funny, which is why I’m giving it…)

Woo, that’s quite the roundup I served all of you! Expect something like this every week, and I hope you enjoyed this week’s version of web goodness.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Technology Sites Receive an Overwhelming Majority of Search Traffic from Google

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Posted by randfish

A great many tech-specific site owners consistently bemoan the fact that market share stats like these:

Percentage of U.S. Searches Among Leading Search Engine Providers

Oct.-07

Sept.-07

Oct.-06

www.google.com

64.49%

63.55%

60.94%

search.yahoo.com

21.65%

22.55%

22.34%

search.msn.com

7.42%*

7.83%*

10.72%*

www.ask.com

4.76%

4.32%

4.34%

Note: Data is based on four week rolling periods (ending Oct. 27, 2007, Sept. 29, 2007, Oct. 28, 2006) from the Hitwise sample of 10 million US Internet users.

* - includes executed searches on Live.com and MSN Search.

Source: Hitwise

don’t come close to their own experiences with search traffic. Since I get into a lot of conversations around Google’s dominant market share and see plenty of raised eyebrows from savvy technologists, bloggers and marketers, I figured I’d ping my good friend Matt Tatham at Hitwise, to see if he could help solve the mystery, which of course, he did (thanks Matt!).

Take a look at the chart below - it shows the percentage of upstream traffic (that’s all traffic - search engines, direct type-in, referral links, email, etc.) to technology and tech media websites. Hitwise places these in two separate categories "IT and Internet" and "IT Media." A site like Sourceforge would probably fit in the former, while SEOmoz would be in the latter.

Hitwise Data for Upstream Traffic from Google to Technology Websites

The graph tells us that Google sends 15.73% of all traffic to all websites. That alone is an interesting figure, as it tells us something about how we surf the web - yes, search is certainly a huge driver of traffic, but it may not be the juggernaut we sometimes think it is. 75%+ of web traffic comes from other sources - following links, typing in domains, email, bookmarks, blogs and social media.

More relevant to our discussion, however, is the data showing that 31.95% of all traffic to "IT Media" sites comes from Google and 5.78% of all traffic to "IT and Internet" sites has Google as the referrer. Let’s compare this data against Yahoo! and MSN/Live to see whether and how much Google is over-represented in the online tech world.

Hitwise's US Upstream Traffic to Technology Sites from Yahoo!

Yahoo! sends 6.92% of all traffic to "IT Media" sites, 1.90% to "IT & Internet" sites and 4.43% of all website referral traffic.

Hitwise data for Upstream Traffic to Tech Sites from MSN Search

Hitwise's US Upstream traffic from Live.com to Technology Sites

Matt’s taken the time to break out Live.com vs. MSN.com, which gives us a peek into the distribution between the two (Live’s still much smaller). But I’ve combined the data for easy comparison and between the two, Microsoft web search products send 1.61% of traffic to all websites, 2.1% of traffic to "IT Media" and 0.65% to Internet & Technology sites. Taken together, this data gives a chart that looks something like:

Hitwise Engine Comparison Data

Takeaways:

  • If you’re in IT Media, there’s a good reason you’re seeing 75-85% of your search traffic come from Google. Don’t panic - you’re not being "under-represented" in Yahoo! & MSN, that’s just the way it is.
  • If you look at the Internet & Technology column, you might be surprised to see that Google’s only at around 70%, but my guess is that Yahoo! is actually listed in Hitwise as an "Internet & Technology" website, and they do a very good job of sending a lot of traffic back into the Yahoo! network. Still, 70% is bigger than the 64% market share number, and my guess is it’s even larger than that.
  • Google sends 72% of traffic to websites compared to Yahoo!’s 20% and MS’ 7.4% - these numbers don’t quite match up to the search shares, but that’s to be expected. This data tells me that Google is slightly more successful in sending actual traffic to their search results than Yahoo! and Microsoft - perhaps there are more "frustrated" searchers on the other two engines, or perhaps they are both "retaining" more of their searchers inside their own content networks.

In any case, this should help to quell a bit of the fear around the common question:

I get 85% of my traffic from Google - what am I doing wrong in Yahoo! and MSN/Live?

It could likely be that you’re doing nothing wrong at all, and Google simply dominates the upstream search traffic in your niche. For those who are curious, here’s SEOmoz’s breakdown of search referral traffic:

SEOmoz Search Engine Traffic Breakdown by Engine

Hitwise doesn’t specifically monitor the webmaster/Internet marketing niche, but I suspect the numbers are even more Google-centric as webmasters tend to be extremely biased in Google’s favor (at least, from a usage perspective).

BTW - I’m not 100% sold on the accuracy of Hitwise’s data. I think that relatively speaking, it’s usually solid, but I wouldn’t go out and swear in court that the numbers are precise. I usually take them with a +/- 25% swing, but it’s certainly better than nothing (and considerably better than Quantcast, Alexa or Compete).

Do you like this post? Yes No

Intention is Cause!

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Have you ever in your life felt that you had a so strong intention that you just know that nothing can stop you from achieving or reaching a certain thing?
In the elite organization I worked in during 1999-2004 we received mental training how to achieve this mental state. I will give you some examples that is perhaps a little too extreme but it will demonstrate my point.
Here is a quote we used to scream as hard as we could in unison all together:
“YOU ARE TOTALLY […]

Third Annual Report: My Success Online

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

On the 5th of December 2004 I changed my life 180 degrees. I quit my earlier life and moved back to Sweden to change my life totally.
That is now 3 years ago.
This is the third annual report on how I with no money, education, experience or connections could sit down and learn, observe and start a successful company by will power alone.
2007 has been a very important year for me, a year with monumental changes to both my company and personal life.
If you are interested, […]

Life As a Game of Chess

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

You might have seen in my earlier essays that I like to see life as though it was a game. Now I want to compare life as if it would be a game of chess. I think of it as I am representing the white and black is what I have to overcome in order to reach my life goals. My life goals is to be happy, reaching success as a writer, have many nice friends, getting a good girlfriend, raising successful children, being healthy, […]

24 Qualities That Geniuses Have in Common

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

I am reposting here an excellent article that I first read about 5 years ago. It was first printed by the National Enquirer in 1980 and later reprinted and re-distributed by L. Ron Hubbard (with permission). I have read it many times since then and I feel I just need to share it, it has worked well for me. Let’s all become a genius!

The worlds greatest geniuses have all had 24 personality characteristics in common and you can develop the same traits […]